πŸš€ Premium Banner Placement β€” Reach 100K+ daily crypto readersAdvertise with us β†’
LIVE
BTCβ€”ETHβ€”SOLβ€”BNBβ€”XRPβ€”ADAβ€”AVAXβ€”DOGEβ€”LINKβ€”DOTβ€”MATICβ€”ATOMβ€”LTCβ€”TRXβ€”TONβ€”BTCβ€”ETHβ€”SOLβ€”BNBβ€”XRPβ€”ADAβ€”AVAXβ€”DOGEβ€”LINKβ€”DOTβ€”MATICβ€”ATOMβ€”LTCβ€”TRXβ€”TONβ€”
β€”β–²0.0%
News

Consensys Splits MetaMask Off and Says Nothing About an IPO

10 Sept 2026by CryptoJazz Admin1 min read3 views
Consensys Splits MetaMask Off and Says Nothing About an IPO

Consensys Software Inc. said on Wednesday it will become two independently operated companies. The existing entity carries on under a new name, MetaMask, with Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin as chairman and chief executive. Its protocols group and institutional infrastructure business move into a newly formed company that keeps the Consensys name, run by Mike Kriak. The separation is expected to be finished by the end of 2026. Neither the announcement nor the company's spokespeople said anything about the stock market listing the firm has been circling since spring.

Two companies, one org chart

The consumer half is the part most people have touched. MetaMask is a self-custodial wallet, which means the keys sit with the holder and not with a company, and the announcement puts it at more than 100 million downloads across roughly 190 countries, with trillions of dollars in cumulative transaction volume behind it. No account gives a precise volume figure and the company did not supply one. Lubin runs that business. He also stays on at the other one as executive chairman, alongside David Cunningham as president.

The infrastructure half takes the Ethereum work: the Linea network, the Besu execution client and the Teku consensus client, the software that lets a machine follow and validate the chain. Those clients ship on the same schedule as everything else in the protocol, including the two must-ship EIPs for the Hegota fork. Its customers are banks and asset managers, the same institutions now building shared tokenized-deposit rails of their own. The Block names Citi, DTC and BNY Mellon among the clients. No other account carries that list.

The listing question nobody would answer

CoinDesk reported in May that Consensys had pushed a potential US listing back to the autumn at the earliest, blaming market conditions, and that JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs had reportedly been engaged to lead it. CoinDesk says it emailed the company on Tuesday to ask whether that timetable still held, and had no reply by the time it published. Fortune asked Lubin directly and got a decline. The announcement mentions no listing, and does not say which company might pursue one.

"We don't comment on market speculation or potential future capital markets activity. What we can say is that MetaMask and Consensys are two strong businesses operating in distinct markets, with different growth trajectories and paths to value creation," a spokesperson told Fortune.

Fortune's own reading is that a standalone MetaMask could seek a listing as early as 2027. That is the outlet's inference from what Lubin told it about consumer growth, not a plan the company has stated.

A token that may or may not be coming

On one point the accounts pull apart. The Block writes that Lubin had previously confirmed a MetaMask token and that its status after the split is unconfirmed. Fortune has him saying the current business and regulatory climate leaves fewer firms inclined to issue their own cryptocurrencies, which reads as a step back from the earlier hints. The two do not reconcile, and we could not establish which set of remarks came later. Nothing in Wednesday's release addresses a token either way.

The parts of a split that were left blank

What the consumer business has been shipping is on the record. MetaMask added a Mastercard spending card early this year and launched its Money Account in June, paying 4% on balances held in mUSD, its own dollar-denominated stablecoin. Cointelegraph reports the card went out across 49 US states, and that February brought access to about 200 tokenized US stocks, funds and commodities through Ondo Global Markets. Both details appear in that outlet alone.

The mechanics of the separation are another matter. No account says how the two companies will be owned once they part, how staff and the balance sheet divide, or what either entity is capitalised with. Lubin told Fortune the split followed a recognition that MetaMask was accruing value faster than the rest of the business. That is the closest thing to a reason on the record. The rest arrives with the paperwork.

Read also: Ethereum Foundation Cuts 54 Staff and 40% of Its 2026 Budget

← All news