πŸš€ Premium Banner Placement β€” Reach 100K+ daily crypto readersAdvertise with us β†’
LIVE
BTCβ€”ETHβ€”SOLβ€”BNBβ€”XRPβ€”ADAβ€”AVAXβ€”DOGEβ€”LINKβ€”DOTβ€”MATICβ€”ATOMβ€”LTCβ€”TRXβ€”TONβ€”BTCβ€”ETHβ€”SOLβ€”BNBβ€”XRPβ€”ADAβ€”AVAXβ€”DOGEβ€”LINKβ€”DOTβ€”MATICβ€”ATOMβ€”LTCβ€”TRXβ€”TONβ€”
Blockchain

Cardano's Van Rossem Fork Is Its First Fully On-Chain Upgrade

18 Jul 2026by CryptoJazz Admin1 min read20 views
Cardano's Van Rossem Fork Is Its First Fully On-Chain Upgrade

Cardano completed its Van Rossem hard fork at 21:44:51 UTC on Saturday, moving the mainnet to protocol version 11 with no downtime. The upgrade was the first in the network's history to run from proposal to activation entirely through on-chain governance, with no company or foundation setting the timeline. It had been ratified five days earlier, at 21:45 UTC on 13 July, once three separate groups of voters cleared the thresholds written into the rules. The payload was five Cardano Improvement Proposals, most of them aimed at making smart-contract execution cheaper, plus a security change requiring every stake pool to use a unique VRF key.

The Mechanics: A Rule Change Every Node Has to Accept

A hard fork is a change to the rules a blockchain uses to decide which blocks are valid. Because software running the old rules would reject blocks produced under the new ones, the change is not optional in the way an ordinary release is: node operators have to upgrade or stop following the chain everyone else is on. That is why forks are usually scheduled well in advance and coordinated by whoever maintains the client software. Cardano's activation was recorded at a precise second and, according to the project, produced no interruption to block production.

What "governed on-chain" changes is who authorizes that moment. In the common arrangement, a foundation or core development company decides that an upgrade is ready and sets the date, and the community's influence is exercised by running the software or declining to. Here the upgrade was enacted because a vote recorded on the ledger itself passed the required thresholds. The proposal, the votes and the enactment are all transactions anyone can inspect after the fact, and no off-chain body held the trigger.

The Vote: 77.63% of DReps and a 6-0-0-1 Committee

Three bodies had to approve. Delegated representatives, or DReps β€” holders who vote with their stake or hand that power to someone who votes on their behalf β€” returned 77.63% in favor against a 60% requirement. Stake pool operators, who run the nodes that produce blocks, returned 52.7% against a 51% requirement, clearing the bar by less than two percentage points. The Constitutional Committee, the body that checks proposals against Cardano's constitution, was recorded at 6-0-0-1. With all three thresholds met on 13 July, ratification was automatic and enactment followed on 18 July.

The Payload: Five CIPs Aimed at Plutus Execution Costs

The technical content is narrower than the governance story. CIP-133 adds multi-scalar multiplication primitives, the arithmetic that cryptographic proof systems lean on most heavily. CIP-138, CIP-153, CIP-132 and CIP-109 reduce execution costs in Plutus, Cardano's smart-contract platform, through constant-time array indexing, native handling of the Value type used to represent bundles of assets, and faster list traversal β€” work that lowers what a script pays to run rather than adding a feature users will see. The security change is separate: every stake pool must now use a unique VRF key, the key a pool uses in the random selection process that decides which pool builds the next block. Cardano was not alone in shipping changes at the protocol layer this month; Base activated a token standard implemented inside its node software rather than as a deployable contract.

What Is Unresolved: A 52.7% Margin and the Next Proposal

The narrow stake pool result is the number to carry forward. An upgrade with no organized opposition cleared its operator threshold by 1.7 points, which says little about how a contested proposal would fare, and the system has not yet been tested by one. Removing the company timeline also removes the fallback: if a future vote stalls, there is no foundation that can decide to ship anyway. The Plutus cost reductions, meanwhile, only show up as measurable savings once contracts run against the new pricing on mainnet, so the practical effect of version 11 will be visible in fee data rather than in the fork itself.

Read also: Solana Raises Its Block Compute Limit 66% to 100M Units

← All news